I read a lot of misleading stuff about photographing stars and doing star trails on the internet. So much that I decided to do my own how-to on how I make them. So here goes. Bare with me because this is going to be the longest post EVER!
Some background info.
Back in the days of film, doing star trails was relatively easy. You would pick a film (preferably a faster film) and with the help of a lockable cable release you would open the shutter for hours and hours. The only thing you had to worry about is film reciprocity. You would make 1 exposure for your star trails and that was it. Now this workflow does NOT work in digital any more! Contrary to what a lot of people think. It just does not work. Sensors are not like film! Let me explain.
Why one single long exposure doesn't work anymore?
The biggest reason is called amplifier glow. Ampli-WHAT?! Simple explanation. If you leave your camera 'open' for a long period of time your sensor and your camera's internals will start to heat up. That heat is – in turn – picked up by the sensor. You will start to notice hot spots in the corners first. They can turn up as magenta areas in your photo. Every camera has this. One is more sensitive then the other.
The other reason would be called light pollution. You are better off to take a lot of shorter exposures then one long exposure to do your star trials because when you do short exposure on a high ISO your sky will stay dark(er) then doing a long exposure on low ISO.
What equipment do I use?
- Canon 5DmkII. You want a camera that is good at shooting in the dark. With a good ISO range and an even better signal to noise ratio. The Canon 5DmkII is a really good camera for photographing stars. It has a big ISO range and an easy noise pattern to get rid of in noise reduction software. Another good camera would be the Nikon D3x or D3s. Both have superb low noise ratios. Of course you can shoot star trails with any DSLR you want!
- Fast lens. I use a 24-105mm ƒ4 L cause that's all I got. Anything ƒ4 and faster works perfect. Also wide angle lenses give the best result because they will simply show a bigger area of the sky.
- Tripod. I guess I don't have to explain why.
- Remote release or intervalometer. Remote releases for star trails and star photography work just fine. Intervalometers are more used if you want to do time-lapse photography during the day. It is not really necessary during night photography (I'll tell you why in a minute).
- Maybe a head lamp. But bring a RED one. It won't hurt your eyes as much in the dark and is better at NOT ruining your night vision.
- A full (warm) battery. Very important to not run out of juice.
How to set up your camera.
- High ISO. Usually I use ISO 1600 or ISO 3200 on the 5DmkII (my standard setup is set on ISO 3200). I've even read reports of people using ISO's up to 6400 and get awesome results with the 5DmkII. I've never dared to go that high but I will try that out though.
Stars are not the most bright elements in the sky (plus they are super tiny). So it is important to use a high ISO to get as much star light registered as possible in the least amount of time. Of course we know, high ISO's bring higher noise ratios. But low ISO will give less stars. So just go with the noise. When we will start stacking all the images you will see, the noise will be a lot less then you would anticipate in the first place.
- Biggest ƒ-stop available. Turn your lens wide open.
- Mirror lockup. Once your mirror is locked the only thing that needs to be tripped is the shutter. It cuts the vibrations down a little all though it is not that important in long exposure shots. But every little bit helps.
- Noise reduction. Turn it off. Just turn it off. It's useless. Why? Well you need to understand what your camera does when you put noise reduction on. When you take one image of let's say 20 seconds long. With noise reduction ON the camera immediately takes ANOTHER exposure of the same time (so 20 sec) without opening the shutter after the first shot. So basically it takes a dark frame. And subtracts that frame from your original photo. So that means you are waiting 20 extra long seconds for your camera to finish what it's doing before you can make another shot. This will give your star trails a dotted appearance. You want one continuous star trail. So you can not afford 20 second pauses. BUT at the end of your run, put the lens cap on and take a few pictures (of the same length as the shots you were doing previously). The only thing that will show up on those dark frames is system noise and hot and cold pixels. Once we start the processing you'll see that they come in handy.
Noise on the 5DmkII at ISO 3200 is easy to control (left before, right after Nik Dfine noise reduction).
- Shutter speed. Now here comes the first tricky part. We all know the earth turns on it's axis once every 24 hours. So stars move. Glad we have that down. But stars don't all 'move' at the same relative speed in the night sky. Stars close to the horizon move much faster then stars overhead or even the pole star (which hardly moves at all). So if your doing single shots your exposure time can vary a little when you're shooting close to the horizon or straight overhead. Personally I know doing 15 second shots at ISO 3200 and with my lens set at 24mm at ƒ4 will give me a good result.
You might want to try and pick a night without as much moonlight as possible. You can shoot during full moons, just be prepared to turn your exposure times down even further to avoid overexposure of the sky and foreground.
There is a simple 'formula' to calculate your longest possible exposure time (the time where stars still appear as dots and not as streaks).
The formula I use for stars overhead
600 / focal length*
The formula I use for stars near the horizon
400 / focal length*
* keep your crop factor in mind though.
You want to calculate the focal length for a 35mm equivalent.
When you are doing star trails, pinpoint stars are not really a necessity. Cause after all, we want them to streak up. So do you NOW understand why a simple lockable remote release is sufficient? Since 30 second shots are more then we need. We do not need to make longer then 30 second exposures! And after all every camera has the ability to set exposure times up to 30 seconds before it switches to bulb mode.
Comparison between 30 seconds overhead and 30 seconds of exposure at the horizon.
Notice the stars streaking up in the right shot. 100% crops straight out of the camera without noise reduction.
Notice the stars streaking up in the right shot. 100% crops straight out of the camera without noise reduction.
- White Balance. Another tricky subject. Make sure you DO NOT set it on auto. Cause then the WB can shift between exposures and we don't want that. I usually set it around 2500K – 3500K. Your trying to outbalance any stray man made light that could shine into your sky. In heavily light polluted areas you can still do star trails!
- Autofocus OFF! And IS too. Just put your lens manually on infinity. I've read a lot of reports that lenses can focus 'past infinity' but after some testing I concluded that for my setup, right on the infinity mark works best. You want your stars to be as sharp as pin pricks. Blobs are not as nice.
- Set your camera to make continuos exposures. This way by locking your remote you take a perfect 20 second star picture EVERY 20 seconds.
OK so NOW you are ready to tackle star photography! Go outside and find a dark spot. Setup your camera and start shooting. You can do single exposures or multiple exposures and create your very own star trails.
Processing your pictures.
SO you've shot 100 pictures of 30 seconds each. The first thing I do is I select one frame and do some basic tweaks. I adjust colour temperature, contrast, exposure (I often boost my exposures up to 1.5 steps), black point, a little bit of definition and so on. Then I select the whole series and apply the same tweaks to all of them (easy to do in Aperture, Lightroom or Photoshop).
At this stage – when your doing singles shots – you want to use your preferred noise reduction tool. I like Nik Dfine. But any other tool will work. Add some sharpness et voila, you have yourself a beautiful image of the night sky.
If you want to do star trails there are a couple of options. First you need to export the images to let's say high quality jpegs and put them in a folder (don't forget your dark frames!). Now you can go 3 ways.
- If you're on a MAC platform you can download the free StarStaX program by Markus Enzweiler. You can find it here. This program basically does the same as Startrails (for PC), which you can find here. It combines all your shots into one picture. You can subtract your dark frames and it's all pretty easy and intuitive.
- You can use a batch process in Photoshop and apply an action to combine them all. You can download that action here. At the end make a new layer and copy your dark frame in it. Set the blending mode to subtract. And go from there.
- Or you can do it manually (it's a lot of work) but here is why. The blending mode that is being used by the programs above is the equivalent of the 'Lighten' mode in Photoshop. What that mode does is it shows only the lightest pixels of each frame thus creating the star trails. But one of the characteristics of this mode is that it creates gaps in the star trails. The gaps are NOT there. It is just a side effect from the blending mode.
Combination of shots using with StarTraX. Notice the gaps in the star trails.
Now you can do 2 things.
- Either clone out the billions of gaps. Good luck with that! (that was a joke).
- Or use a combination of the 2 blending modes 'lighten' and 'screen'. Do the following. Load your files into a stack by using file>scripts>load files into stack. Don't convert them into a smart object cause that would beat the purpose. Now you are going to a very boring task. You are going to duplicate a bunch of layers and alternating the screen and lighten modes to blend the layers together.
This is what you do. Turn all the layers off except for the bottom 2. Now set your second layer to blend mode 'screen' and merge layer 1 and 2 together. Set this new layer to ‘lighten’ mode. Now do the same for each pair of layers. Set your third layer to blend mode 'screen', and merge it with the copy of the second layer, then set that new layer to 'lighten'. And repeat. It is a boring task. But once you get the hang of it you'll see it's quite fast.
And the above Photoshop blending mode trick in the shot above produces NO MORE GAPS. Yes the two shots are different because I was lazy and only combined 20 frames in the image above just the illustrate the result.
All you need to do is apply some curves on the above stack and save your image. OR you could have taken every image and turned the exposure down just a fraction. The above technique basically adds exposure (thanks to the screen mode) to the image. So if you take it down 1 step. Combine 2 images that are 1 step underexposed, will produce a normally exposed frame.
Confused?! Don't be. It's pretty easy.
If you want to read up on this trick I would suggest to read a good how to on NaturePhotographers.net. Click here to read it.
If you are lucky enough to live in a place where you can see the auroras and you want to photograph them (like me) you can use the single exposure technique. For my shots I use a predefined setting on my camera. I start with exposures of 15 sec. When the aurora spark up I often go to as low as 6 seconds. I am not changing the ISO. Because if the auroras are fast moving, I want to record as much detail as possible thus I use a short exposure time. It's not rocket science. Just a little bit of logic that's all.
I hope this 'tutorial' is helpful to some of you. If you have ANY questions please do ask. I will answer them in the comments below.
Thanks for reading and now go out and shoot some stars! And please do share! I love looking at night sky pictures.
Great post Oli. Thanks for putting this together.ReplyDelete
This is awesome!! Thanks for the tips :DReplyDelete
Nicely done dude, so when do you want to come join up with me to shoot some stars in the mountains!?ReplyDelete
@Mike. Lets meet after I get back from Nova Scotia! At the end of August? When the new moon is out. (but remind me again, I have a very short memory LOL)ReplyDelete
@Chris Hope it helps Chris. Thanks for the read.
Thanks for writing this Oli. Can't wait to give this a try.ReplyDelete
This is so bizarre. I'm also in Nova Scotia this month, that's where I grew up. That's where the similarities end :) I disagree with just about every piece of advise you give here. Read my thoughts about star trails: http://jonbenphotography.com/blog/2010/10/31/long-exposures-and-star-trails/ReplyDelete
Interesting to hear your thoughts, thanks for sharing.
thanks for the article!
I made 250 pics à 30 seconds last weekend but for some reason I have 6 seconds inbetween each shot (next time I get rid of 2 sec mirror lock-up).
I tried the blending method with the first 20 photos that you describe above but cannot see any improvement.
Is it maybe because the six second delay is just too long?
@JonBen. I understand what you mean on your blog. And that is exactly the stuff that I read on the internet I was referring too.ReplyDelete
Think about this. What do you want when you do star trails? As much stars as possible, right? You say you meter the available light using the center weighted method. Now your foreground will still throw enough weight in the scale to throw that balance way off.
Honestly. Forget about what you learned in photo class about ƒ stops vs ISO vs exposure time. Give the stacking method a try and I WILL GUARANTEE you, you will end up with A LOT more stars in your sky then in your examples!
@ Sandra. 6 second delays will indeed give you little gaps in between the stars. It's just a bit too long. Try it without the mirror lockup. Should be fine. Doesn't matter that much.
Outstanding tutorial Oli! I have bookmarked this one so I can return to it when I am ready to try star trails again. I tried once a few years ago, but not since. So, when are you in Nova Scotia? I am in New Brunswick right now and expect to be in Nova Scotia in a few weeks time, not sure exactly when. It would be really cool to get together if our schedules work out!ReplyDelete
@ Anne: That would be SO AWESOME indeed! We are there from the 9th till the 23rd. Driving around the coast in a clock wise motion starting in Halifax.ReplyDelete
Thanks for posting this.ReplyDelete
Seems to be a lot of work nowadays. Man I miss film.
Very helpful. Thank you. I will use this next week on a trip up to the Utah mountains.ReplyDelete
@ Pablo: I honestly think it gives you a bit more control. But yes it's more complicated then film, I give you that.ReplyDelete
@ Chris: You're welcome! I hope you get some good results. Be sure to share!!!
Thanks for making the effort to post this, great info :)ReplyDelete
Hey Oli, I was just re-reading your post because tomorrow I am going into Big Bend National Park in Texas where the night sky is super dark and I'm hoping to do some star trails. I also downloaded the StarStaX program you recommended. Fingers crossed! Thanks again.ReplyDelete